Book details

  • Publisher

    Independently published

  • Date of
    Publishing

    November 11, 2022

  • Book size

    244 pages

  • Format

    Paperback, Hardcover, Kindle, & Audiobook

Rating

About the book

Gorilla in the Cockpit doesn’t stop at diagnostics and explanations. It offers a solution based on the latest discoveries in neuroscience, psycholinguistics, and behavioral economics, with practical application to real-life projects. Its systematic framework encompasses all steps of leading and managing megaprojects, from design to procurement, stakeholder management to execution, and handover to sustainability.

Readers will learn how to challenge how they see, approach, and lead megaprojects—and massive change programs in their organizations. The book exposes the hidden human patterns that destroy billions (and even trillions) of shareholder value and taxpayer money each year, while presenting a revolutionary way of understanding what happens in the project Black Box and why this drives 65% failure rates. It also explodes the myth that major project failure is inevitable, showing instead how leaders can de-risk their project flight path and boost project success rates.

Gorilla in the Cockpit is a rare look behind the scenes of megaprojects by two seasoned experts. If you want to understand what really goes on in big projects, why they fail so often, and what it takes for them to succeed, this book is a must-read.

AIPMO Review

Rating: 7 – Gorilla in the Cockpit is a distinctive contribution to project leadership literature, shifting attention from process to the human, cultural, and psychological dynamics behind outcomes. Written by two experienced practitioners with international standing, it blends insights from psychology, neuroscience, and systems thinking. The extended flight metaphor and the black box vs. white box framing provide a clear structure that differentiates it from conventional, process-oriented texts.

The authors bring strong credibility as practitioners with vast international experience. Their reputation and standing in project leadership circles lend weight to the book’s arguments, making it especially relevant for senior readers seeking deeper insight and reflection.

The book is well written and accessible, utilizing storytelling, analogies, and case studies to convey complex ideas. The opening narrative (e.g., Boeing 737 MAX) is lengthy and may delay engagement, but interest builds once the authors move into neuroscience and cognitive factors. Figures are conceptually valuable but small and monochrome, which reduces learning impact; larger, color visuals with stronger in-text cross-referencing would materially improve clarity.

Substantively, the book promotes a shift from checklists to causal understanding—why projects succeed or fail—by examining hidden beliefs, biases, and cultural norms (the “black box”) versus visible processes and metrics (the “white box”). This lens is particularly valuable for senior practitioners who are ready to reconsider assumptions. Junior readers may find fewer immediate, step-by-step tools and only moderate decision support, which helps explain the mid-range applicability scores. Case evidence is well integrated and internationally sourced but leans toward construction/infrastructure megaprojects, narrowing the perceived scope. The insights, however, generalize to complex projects of any size or sector; broader coverage of digital, social, and scientific initiatives would enhance diversity and relevance.

The book is best suited to senior leaders, executives, and experienced project professionals who are grappling with complexity, uncertainty, and systemic challenges. Its emphasis on human dynamics and systemic thinking will resonate with those seeking to move beyond procedural methods, while students or early-career practitioners may find it less accessible due to the absence of step-by-step tools.

In terms of originality, the book is a strong synthesis of less mainstream ideas (biases, neuroscience, decision psychology) rather than wholly new theory—more reframing than breakthrough—which aligns with the innovation score.

Bottom line: a well-executed, thought-provoking synthesis that will reward reflective, senior practitioners with durable insights and new thinking habits. Its limitations—narrower case diversity, underpowered visuals, and limited “how-to” tooling for juniors—temper impact and justify the 7/10 overall rating. Suggestions for a future edition include enlarging and colorizing key diagrams, broadening case coverage beyond construction, and adding concise playbooks or checklists to translate the mindset shift into concrete actions and decision aids.

AIPMO scale